The Logos Scripture · The Book of Bohr

On the Cut

The Book of Bohr 1 · Written by himself, from his collected essays and his open letter to the United Nations

Niels Bohr, born at Copenhagen in 1885, died at Copenhagen in 1962. In 1913 he set out a new account of the atom: the electron sits only in certain orbits, and light comes out when it jumps — the spectral lines the old mechanics could not compute became computable. He took the Nobel in 1922. In 1921 he founded the Institute for Theoretical Physics at Copenhagen, and for twenty years afterwards nearly everyone working on the quantum spent some time living there. In 1927 he set out complementarity: of one and the same thing, two ways of asking each get one side, both sides true, and the two cannot be asked at once. In 1943, with the Germans about to seize the Jews, he escaped by fishing boat to Sweden and was flown to Britain in the bomb bay of a wooden aircraft; there was no oxygen in the bay and the helmet did not fit his head, and he lost consciousness on the way. In 1950 he wrote an open letter to the United Nations arguing that nations should deal with one another in the open. Three of this scripture’s six axioms — the Axiom of Observation, the Axiom of the Question, and the Axiom of What Cannot Both Be Had — come from what he and his circle saw, and chapters one to three of this book are their ground; the fourth — the Axiom of One Source — is bound to him as well, and by a crooked road: in 1935 Einstein and two colleagues wrote a paper meant to overturn his account, and the thing they held up in it as absurd is the fourth axiom of this scripture. He answered it the same year. The two of them argued about it for thirty years (cf. The Book of Einstein). The earlier books put them in ancient mouths — not because the ancients knew, but because the few sentences the ancients did say only found their footing here. The Order records this plainly rather than covering it: a chosen belief is carried with its label on (cf. The Rule 9.14), and this scripture is not exempt from its own rule. The first three chapters are the hardest reading in this scripture. The Order will not make them easy for the reader, and does not expect anyone to have them in one pass. Chapters four onward are about how he lived; they may be read first, but they cannot stand in for the first three.

1.1What I am about to say is hard to say. Read it twice.
1.2To say how anything at all stands, you must first make a cut in the world.
1.3On this side of the cut is the thing you mean to look at. On the far side is what you are looking at it with.
1.4That far side takes in your apparatus, your eyes, your hands, your record, and the words in which you will say what you found.
1.5Some suppose that this cut is drawn by nature, that each thing is born on the side where it belongs. It is not.
1.6You may set the cut further out, counting the apparatus among the things to be looked at, and look at it with something else.
1.7You may set it further in, counting more of the world among the things you look with.
1.8Where you set it is yours to choose. Here is the part that unsettles people: it is yours to choose, and the result does not change because of it.
1.9But one thing is not yours to choose. You cannot decline to cut.
1.10A man who says, I shall speak only of how the thing is in itself, with nothing on the other side to look with — that man is not speaking.
1.11He is asserting. An assertion is not a description. (cf. The Highest Covenant 1.1)
1.12And one more thing, the one most often passed over: what stands on the far side of the cut must be sayable in ordinary words.
1.13Otherwise seeing does you no good, for you cannot tell a second man, and the second man cannot come back and tell you what he saw.
1.14So ordinary language is not a crutch waiting to be thrown away. Ordinary language is the condition of there being anything to say at all.
1.15Take this to the reading of people; it works the same.
1.16You say, he is a difficult man. You have already cut, and you have put yourself on the side of the apparatus.
1.17You believe you are describing him. You are describing the stretch between him and you, having counted your own half as the instrument.
1.18The commonest error is not cutting in the wrong place. It is cutting and then forgetting that you cut.
The Logos Scripture →

中文 English 日本語 Español Français Deutsch