The Logos Scripture · The Book of Paine

On Why I Wrote in Words a Farmer Could Read

The Book of Paine 1 · Written by himself, from Common Sense, Rights of Man, The Age of Reason, and his letters

Thomas Paine, born at Thetford in England in 1737, died at New York in 1809. He made stays as a young man, later collected excise and kept a school. In 1774 he met Franklin in London and went to Philadelphia with his letter of introduction (cf. The Book of Franklin). In January 1776 he published Common Sense, arguing that the American colonies should separate from England; it sold enormously and he gave away everything due to him. That winter he wrote The American Crisis, the first number of which was read to the troops. In 1791 and 1792 he published Rights of Man; the English government charged him with seditious libel, convicted him in his absence, and he never returned. On the twenty-eighth of December 1793 the French imprisoned him in the Luxembourg, where he came near to being executed; he was released in November of the following year through the efforts of Monroe, the American minister. In 1794 and 1795 he published The Age of Reason, which cost him his standing entirely. He returned to America in 1802 to abuse in the newspapers, old acquaintances who no longer knew him, and in one place a refusal of his vote. He died in New York on the eighth of June 1809. Six people came to the burial: an Irish lawyer, the woman who had taken him in with her two sons, and two black men whose names nobody wrote down. He had asked to be buried in the Quakers ground and was refused; their stated reason was that people already accused their society of holding no creed, and that burying him would give the charge something to rest on. In 1819 Cobbett dug up the bones and carried them to England meaning to rebury them; the bones were afterwards lost and are unaccounted for still. This volume rests on what he wrote himself. On belief: he was not an atheist but a deist, and said of himself that he believed in one God and no more; The Age of Reason was written half against the church and half against the temper then abroad in France which held that nothing at all should be believed. The Order records this as he put it and does not tidy it. What matters is the same point: no argument of his closes on divine will, and he read the book everyone calls a god’s with the method one uses on any book. What this volume brings is not the reasoning — Hume is there before him (cf. The Book of Hume 2). What it brings is an act: carrying that reasoning to people who do not read philosophy, deliberately, in their own words, and paying for it with everything he had. The sentence in chapter one is where the Order takes the volume to come to rest: if a case can be understood by only twenty men, those twenty have decided for everybody. That is not a question of learning. It is a question of power.

1.1I was a staymaker’s son and made stays myself, and collected taxes, and taught school, and was not much good at any of them.
1.2At thirty-seven I reached America carrying a letter of introduction that Franklin had written for me in London. (cf. The Book of Franklin)
1.3Two years later I wrote a pamphlet about whether that country should separate from England.
1.4Let me state the rule I set myself in writing it, because the rule will outlast anything in the pamphlet.
1.5There was no shortage of writing on the question then, and it was all written for educated men: tags of Latin, precedents out of antiquity, distinctions of law.
1.6I used none of it.
1.7I used the words that farmers and blacksmiths and sailors use every day.
1.8Some called me coarse for it. I do not argue. I ask a different question: whom does this matter to?
1.9It matters to the men who will have to fight, and pay, and die.
1.10Then the reasoning should be laid before them, in words they can follow.
1.11If a case can be understood by only twenty men, those twenty have decided for everybody.
1.12That is not a question of learning. It is a question of power. Writing deep is a way of shutting a door.
1.13That pamphlet sold enormously and I took not a penny. I gave away everything due to me, and it went to buy clothing for the troops.
1.14I do not say this to be admired. I say it to explain something: had the pamphlet made me money, every sentence I wrote afterwards would have been weighed — and what did he get out of saying that?
1.15I closed that question off before it could be asked.
1.16I also wrote a piece saying the trade in Africans ought not to exist. It came before the rest and very few read it.
1.17I set it down here because a man who says all men are born equal, while leaving half of them out of the count, has no standing to say it.
The Logos Scripture →

中文 English 日本語 Español Français Deutsch