The Logos Scripture · The Book of Figueres

On doubt, and on how to live

The Book of Figueres 4 · Written by himself, from two long television conversations of the 1980s, and from Letters to a Citizen and The Poverty of Nations

José Figueres Ferrer, called Don Pepe, born 1906 at San Ramón in Costa Rica to parents who had come from Catalonia, died 1990, aged eighty-three. He studied in Boston as a young man and returned to run a farm and several enterprises. In 1948 the government annulled the election that Ulate had won. He took up arms, the war ran forty-four days, more than two thousand died, and it remains the bloodiest event in that country’s twentieth century. After the fighting he headed the Founding Junta of the Second Republic for eighteen months, during which there was no election. On 1 December 1948 he broke a wall of the Bellavista barracks with a sledgehammer and abolished the standing army; the building became the national museum. The next year it entered the constitution as Article 12. In the same period he gave women the vote, gave citizenship to Afro-Costa Ricans, and nationalised the banks. In 1949 he handed the presidency to Ulate. He was elected in 1953 and left when the term ended in 1958; elected again in 1970 and left again in 1974. This volume rests on what he said himself: two long television conversations of the 1980s, and his books Letters to a Citizen and The Poverty of Nations. Chapter three is from the opening of one of those conversations: a dictatorship is fatally inefficient because it dispenses with the initiative of those it governs; a democracy is efficient by nature because it is the sum of the free intelligences of its members; a dictatorship looks backward and is stagnation, gloom and death, a democracy looks forward and is evolution, splendour and life. The pillow, the salt cod, the grandmother’s saying, the sentence from the Mexican, the regret about mixing public office with private enterprise in chapter four, and the agnosticism and the drying tree in chapter five, are all from the same source. This scripture already holds The Book of Washington, on a man who could have kept the seat and did not, and The Book of Mandela, on the same thing done a second time. No volume held this one: not laying the instrument down but destroying it. This volume fills that place. And the act is testable, and has been tested for seventy-seven years. Costa Rica has had no coup and no civil war since 1948, while its neighbours — Nicaragua, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Panama — took coups, juntas and killings one after another. Same era, same region, same poverty; the army is what differed, and so did the outcome. In 1994 Panama likewise forbade a standing army by constitutional amendment. A precedent set once is one man’s affair; when a second country walks it, it becomes a road (see The Book of Washington 3.9). The Order records where he cuts against this scripture and hides none of it. First, he began that war and more than two thousand died in it. That stands at the head of chapter one, in the text and not in this note. Second, Article 98 of the constitution outlawed the Costa Rican Communist Party from 1949 until 1975, twenty-six years. But in the constituent assembly of that year Ulate’s side took thirty-four of the forty-five seats, the constitution they produced was far more moderate than the one he wanted, and his own draft was voted down. Whether that article was his work the Order cannot say, and it records the fact and the balance of the assembly rather than guessing. Third, the official United States diplomatic record has him dealing with the Central Intelligence Agency through the 1950s and 1960s and funding anti-communist bodies; and in April 1970 the Americans learned that he had accepted covert Soviet support of two hundred thousand eight hundred and ninety dollars, passed to him by Manuel Mora, Secretary General of the Costa Rican Communist Party. A country whose constitution outlawed that party, and money reaching its president-elect from that party’s secretary general. The Order sets it down whole and does not explain it for him. Fourth, abolishing a standing army is not disarming a state. Costa Rica has police, a coast guard and border forces. This volume claims no more than happened.

4.1I was asked how far doubt had marked my life. I said: always.
4.2A man may be certain of anything at all — so long as not the least circumstance changes.
4.3And circumstances are changing all the time.
4.4So the Spanish have a good saying, and we have it here too: take the matter to bed and consult the pillow.
4.5I am doubting at this moment. I do not know whether the position I hold is the one this country most has use for.
4.6It is good to think. It is good to doubt.
4.7Now about how to live.
4.8When Napoleon came in, my family went hungry at Tarragona. The thing was handed down from one generation to the next.
4.9My father as a boy told his own father that he did not like salt cod. The punishment was a fortnight of nothing but salt cod.
4.10Because in a house like that, to say I do not like this food was an offence. What you were to say was: thank God there is food.
4.11My grandmother’s saying was this: better that it should do you harm than that it should be wasted.
4.12I have never in my life been to a dance, I cannot dance, and I have never taken liquor.
4.13I tried a pipe as a student in Boston, but of the three things — pipe, matches, tobacco — I always mislaid one; and then I found it hindered my concentration, so I stopped.
4.14There is a sentence I have kept all my life. A Mexican said it, not a Frenchman and not an Englishman, and I want that made clear.
4.15The sentence is this: nobody has a right to the superfluous while there are any who lack what is indispensable.
4.16And another: if a man does not live as he thinks, he will end by thinking as he lives.
4.17A man goes into politics, begins to enjoy abundance and flattery, and his thinking shifts across to meet it.
4.18I have lived simply. For many years a roof that did not leak was a great comfort to me — no getting up in the night to move the bed.
4.19I was asked what my largest error in public life had been. I said: I confused public business with running enterprises.
4.20The state was not doing agricultural or industrial research, so I had my own companies pay for it. The companies suffered, my household suffered, my children suffered.
4.21Other men in politics use their access to government to feed their companies. With me it has always run the other way: every rise in wages I fought for cut my own companies first.
The Logos Scripture →

中文 English 日本語 Español Français Deutsch